Live From The Armagh Palace Of Archbishop Eamon Martin Who Allows Mass In North But Prohibits It Ten Miles Away In South|The Real Racism Is Against Europeans: Exchange The Word White With Black In This Video And Imagine The Uproar|8 Ways Covid ‘Vaccines’ Can Kill You (Dr Sherri Tenpenny)|The Pharma Industry Is All About Money: Keeping People Ill So They Can Profit On Their Pain|Prof Luke O’Neill Insists Uninfected People Don’t Need Face Masks And That He Won’t Be Getting Vaxxed|Irish Media Under Attack From Within, Vaccine Hell In Donnolly/Harris Ghetto And The Awakening Progresses In Ireland|Dublin Bus Management Confirms Its Drivers Are Not Allowed To Ask For Extra Information From Passengers Who Say They Are Exempt From Wearing Masks|The Framing Of Aaron Brady By Prime Time Colluding With Criminal Gardai|Multicultural Paris: Women Are No Longer Safe On The Streets Of Diverse Utopian Europe|Waken Up Ireland: It’s Time To Get Your Megaphones, Banners And Leaflets Out

Defending our Freedoms

We are writing this letter to request that a federal investigation be commenced and/or expedited regarding the scientific debate on major policy decisions during the COVID-19 crisis. In the course of our work, we have identified issues of a potentially criminal nature and believe this investigation necessary to ensure the interests of the public have been properly represented by those promoting certain pandemic policies.

During times of crisis, citizens naturally turn to the advice of those they perceive as experts. In early 2020, the public turned to the advice of scientific authorities when confronted with an apparent viral outbreak. Soon after, most nations followed the advice of prominent scientists and implemented restrictions commonly referred to as “lockdowns.” While the policies varied by jurisdiction, in general they involved restrictions on gatherings and movements and the closure of schools, businesses, and public places, inspired by those imposed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in Hubei Province. The intervention of federal authorities with police power may be required to ensure that those who have promoted these lockdown policies have done so in good faith.

This letter is meant to call the attention of federal authorities in Australia, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States (the “Nations”) to multiple points of evidence about the origin and historical precedent of lockdowns; the scientific literature and debate behind them; the provenance and quality of predominant COVID-19 testing protocols and models; the motivations, biases, and qualifications of certain prominent lockdown supporters; and the source of public-facing communications surrounding these policies.